An assignment rule can now act when a record is corrected, and five more modules can be routed

Ask what should happen when somebody has deliberately moved a record and it is then saved again. Every time means the rule is the final word. That is right when it expresses a standing arrangement, such as every enquiry from an ad belongs to the ads desk, whoever has touched it since. Only when it newly matches means the person’s decision is the final word, and the rule steps in only when something genuinely changed into its territory.

One thing to watch on every time: where an entry names several people it hands records out in turn, so each save moves the record on to the next of them. The screen says so where it applies. On an entry with no conditions (one covering every record), that means every save in the whole module.

Whichever you pick, handing somebody a record by name in that same save still wins: the person doing it has decided, and no rule overrules them. Reassigning in bulk is not touched at all.

No. Every existing rule kept running exactly as before, on create only, and no record was reassigned. The second setting only matters once you move a rule off when a record is created, so nothing you have today is touched by it either.

The five new modules have no rules until somebody writes one, and until then a purchase order belongs to whoever raised it, as it always has.

As before, every decision is written down (which rule, which person, and why), so both “why did I get this” and “why did nobody get it” still have an answer.